Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:54

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump airs frustrations with Xi and Jerome Powell over elusive economic goals - NBC News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Healthy aging: Eating more berries, flavanoids may be key - Medical News Today
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Toyota Ends Up Fastest in Night Practice - Sportscar365
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Dodgers To Designate Chuckie Robinson For Assignment - MLB Trade Rumors
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
CBS Sports and Pac-12 extend partnership through the 2030-31 season - Pac-12 Conference
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Exclusive Trump interview: A big steel deal for Pennsylvania - Washington Examiner